YAR Yet Another Remake: knockoff's, covers, & remakes of shows, movies, & music songs; negative connotation

I am Officially coining an acronym. Been using this for a few years now.. hopefully it will catch on, perhaps sending a message to writers to be innovative and to producers/editors to take more risks.

YAR Yet Another Remake: knockoff's, covers, & remakes of shows, movies, & music songs; negative connotation

To Qualify as a YAR it must be a poorly done copy cat of a better original, or a ineffective rehash of something that was already terrible, not improved by the remake, and amounts to a wasted effort.

http://wttrend.com/806372

For example, the recent cover of "Bad Company" by Five Finger Death Punch really was Bad. The original is a great classic rock song. The new one just gives a modern formula based facelift to the song without improving the earlier vesion in anyway, and usually mangling the earlier version.

The opposite of a YAR would be all the songs on the Soundtrack to Harry Met Sally  by Harry Connick Jr. Sure, Sinatra & Bennett are amazing, but Connick's renditions were going in new directions that stood on their on while not taking away from the earlier versions.


https://plus.google.com/u/0/s/%23Ingress

ASUS Router RT-N16 fancy time waster

@ASUS Router RT-N16 fancy time waster http://j.mp/wjKJ6J via @bryangrant RE: @dlna

This device had several problems, and very little that deserves merit.

I filed a complete support ticket.. it is now day 3 waiting for a response.

I am returning the item this evening.

There is a long list of issues I found on their own site after the purchase, and the new Firmware created some new issues such as will not login via PPoE, will not print via LPR, will not stream DLNA media content over the same LAN subnet, will not mount external drive.

Opensource DDWRT replacement firmware will not support uPnP.
http://j.mp/zYK2gV

Since the primary use of this upgrade to my LAN, besides day-to-day home office tasks, will be to view content on the servers over DLNA, this product is rendered 100% useless.


Firmware 1.0.x
- Currently it ships with Firmware 1.0 installed. Noob users would pull their hair out if they tried to use that build since it has a very long list of flaky problems.
- WDS will not work,
- the uPnP doesn't work
- The WiFi flaps so badly it is not possible to reliably connect.
- PPoE is unreliable [pppd[1986]: Unable to complete PPPoE Discovery]
- External drive mounted flawlessly.

Firmware 3.0.x
- Will not import old router .cfg file. Manually reconfig the router from scratch. *sigh*
- WDS now works just fine
- uPnP is VERY broken. Will not look at external drive's partitions. Inserted a tiny partition onto the drive without my approval. DLNA service simply to NOT work.
- PPoE worked great for 4 days. Then.. just stopped. It will not login to the internet any longer. PPoE via direct cable to the DSL modem works fine, so the router is the culprit.
- Printer server no longer will access a HP LaserJet 1300 via LPR. Worked fine with old 1.0 Firmware.
 - The very same External HardDrive will no longer mount the partitions I wish to share.

@dlna
@ASUS

NetFlix Instant Viewing - poor selection, frustrating service. Skip It.

Warning to all people considering using using Netflix to watch videos over the internet, affording the convenience of instant access and dispensing with the need to fiddle around with mailing DVD's.

1- Library- Selection of videos is VERY limited. Compared to the NetFlix DVD database, there is a 1 in 20 chance of being able to download a video, instead of being able to view it instantly. There is no consistency in what is available for Instant Viewing. For example, of the Matrix movie trilogy, the first movie is only available via DVD mailing, the other two and the cartoon DVD are available via
instant viewing. Battlestar 1980 has all episodes except for the first one. Yes, I am a Sci-Fi buff, but is that too much to expect to have the entire series of a given title available versus pieces of a title? As for Sci-Fi, there is a very narrow selection of A movies, current shows are practically non-existent, and the majority of Instant movies are B class or lower. They have a few token classics, and that is it.

2- Wii- The viewing of the videos on the Wii Console is poor at best. For starters, the viewing of movies is poor at best. While you are able to watch a video on your laptop, though you are within 3 feet of the location of the Wii, the Wii will not find the server, though the laptop plays the video perfectly. The Wii will not access NetFlix, even though it is able to use Opera to view web pages, Mii can send Mii's, and the news/weather works very well. All indicators point to a very very poor implementation of the NetFlix for Wii software. It's malfunctions prevent prompt, reliable, or even enjoyable viewing.

The Wii NetFlix user interface also is lacking. You can not search for titles without a Laptop. I have dozens of Barney and other children's titles automatically populated, though I had completed the "interview" on the website which allows your selections to be selected "intelligently".

3- LG - LG has several players designed specifically for NetFlix. All the conditions in #1 holding true, the device presents video with a high degree of aliasing rendering a poor experience for the viewer with blocks of graphics and blurring. The user interface is vastly inferior to that of the Wii, and all the shortcomings of the Wii interface are doubly lacking in the LG.

Customer support is non-existent with an email connection that does not exist. You can only send an indicator to them that a given video has failed to perform. You can call them, but the hold times are regularly over 20 minutes.

Picasa, photo album applications, and our personal memories

I have noticed a few wishlist items that are not yet included in Picasa. Iwork on both PC and Mac platforms, but this statement should also be taken to include Linux platforms as well.

One of the long standing issues of digital photography management has been been related to tagging, file naming, and captioning of photos.

What is really needed is an open, published standard for the handling of captions, file names, and titles. Users invest a ton of time and energy into labeling their photos, and if you remember that the annotations on the back of physical photos are very useful for identifying to historians and descendants who is in a photograph, likewise, captions and labels are equally important and deserve a level of care which is not yet present in the tools available today. Furthermore, since we are all embarking into the realm of introducing video and audio media into our personal lives and histories, we should consider applying a similar open source standard framework to applications that display or host these file types.

The goal should be that where ever the image file is sent, the image is accompanied by the relevant captioning data, and is securable by the sender or creator.

One thing the latest Picasa 3.5 does do reasonably well is apply (c) copywright text information into the image itself so one can post it to the internet, and at least have demonstrable evidence that the photographer did attempt to protect their intellectual property rights for the image. It's only drawback is the file management, locating the originals and duplicates is a bit confusing to say the least. You also have to "trick" the program into actually labeling the photos, since the option only exists when your are attempt to upload the photos to the picasa site forcing you to follow a convoluted work flow to label your photos uploading, then downloading them locally for later use.

As for captioning labeling etc, I noticed this was a problem when I migrated FROM iPhoto to Picasa. I had hoped that Picasa would serve as a conduit so I could migrate from Mac to Windows and keep all the captioning information for the 5000+ photos in the library. Picasa ignores the captioning and albums in iPhoto. Picasa only imports the file name and the folders. All of this information in a XML file which could, in theory, be read by another application. The API is published since iPhoto plug-ins for Facebook, Flickr, and Picasa all allow the captions to be exported to the related web photo servers. Picasa's local client simply ignores the information.
iPhoto itself also ignores this information since if you back up your photos, suffer a catastrophic failure, then resotre, the XML file often does not work with the restored data.

On Windoze, Picasa has a better excuse since there are endless photo album/management software applications, it can not really be expected that Picasa would interact with any of them very well since there are so many. However, Picasa on Windoze and Mac does not recognize if you have Picasa web albums online already, and then match up your pre-existing local photos accordingly. It assumes you uploaded the photos from that Picasa location. You can download an album, but you end up with duplicates and a lot of work sorting them afterwards.

PDA Meltdown - Sync and Destroy!

Excuse the rant.. but.. really..

Is really too much to ask the software development community to come up with a standard for PDA/PIM data interchange?

(Join the movement! Join our FaceBook group!
It is not as if PDA functionality wasn't already working as long ago as Outlook97! Why do they ("they".. not "them", a totally different group with a different agenda!) insist upon breaking things that really should consistent and reliable cornerstones of our daily work environment?


Why haven't Outlook replacements been better adapted? Evolution as an example.. great project.. very robust application.. then inexplicably went nowhere except to the deep6 section of Novell's website.

How hard could it possibly be to create a framework where all of your PDA components interoperate? Tasks, Notes, Contacts, Calendar, and then link to your emails? How hard could it be to make reminders, vcards, and event invitations work across the various gadgets?

It is not as if the record label "home address" or "work phone" needs to be different in each place, or does it? I guess some people think it is useful to call the data records different things.. just to make life interesting?

Just try to integrate a CRM system in the following mix.. pure joy.

Gmail... no tasks in the calendar.. no notes either.. unless you do some arcane backflips using email drafts or blog entries.. and then they would not sync to your mobile tool, so what is the point of bothering? The google sync tool is "broken" between various data locations like Mac Apps, Entourage, and Outlook. There are 3rd party solutions, but my survey shows them to be a rogues gallery of other inadequate solutions.

Plaxo.. When the Plaxo Sync tool does not make your system do a three-legged race during pollen season.. it works fine.. if fine is defined as no Notes or Tasks Synced except with Outlook, and your gmail contacts is a one way sync that ends up forcing you to delete your gmail online address book every few months to remove the thousands of duplicates!

Blackberry.. does go a along way.. but still has issues with stand alone calendar invites to people outside of your organization, creating duplicates.. Over the Air (OTA) syncing doesn't exist, unless you have the Enterprise server, and then have set it up.. why wasn't this available from our phone carriers? We have data services on our phones, why not use them for something that reduces our workload!

Apple Apps - just plain stink. Ever tried to use cut n paste inside of Address Book? Pure fun. AB selects ALL the text as soon as you finish what you intended to select! It has been doing that for 3 years now.

iCal and Outlook? Totally different file formats.

How about using a different email app from Mac Mail? If you do, there is no way to tell Address Book NOT to use Mac Mail. There is no Notes application, at least not one that syncs to your mobile devices without the need to buy 3rd party software.. and if you read the reviews for MissingSync, you dodged a bullet by not using it! Oh. Lest I forget.. Tasks do not sync to anything outside of Apple Apps, Plaxo ignores them. So.. useless.

Entourage on Mac? It is a cul-de-sac for your data. It is the Hotel California of PIM Software. Once you have migrated to it, you will never leave, at least not with your Categories intact. Try it sometime. Try going to Outlook FROM Entourage. I guess that is what Microsoft considers to be end-to-end cross platform compatbility touted by it's Mac Office Business Unit. Have a look at their own words

Outlook has great features. One of my favorite features is when Outlook is not crashing trying to use IMAP with gmail... Too bad it runs on Windoze.. so you are left wide open to attack if you an average user who is not savvy enough to set up all your security apps the "right way" or have a resident geek in the family to make sure you are all buttoned up. As for Vista being secure.. just keep on clicking every 5 seconds. are you sure? Are you really sure? No really really really.. are you sure? Then you still might be able to run something on your own system without fiddlin with it, or calling the resident geek in to fix it. I am that resident geek, and I simply can't get away charging my relatives for my services! It is not kricket to bill family!

Just try sending a vcard from your computer to your blackberry. It cant read it. Yet, vcard standards have been set in stone since for over a decade.. unless it is true that vcard 3.0 just broke everything in the name of progress. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/VCard

Geez.

Volvo and iPod-together at long last

Last week, I received my car back from the Volvo dealership where they had removed the iPod cable, replaced my CD Changer, and granted a full refund. The product was that bad. They did not even make a fuss once it was clear to them the nature of the situation.

Having tried every single Apple store offering for connecting a car to an iPod, having tried the dealership method, I was getting all geared up to look into simply replacing the head unit for a unit that is compatible.

Saturday, I popped into the local Eckerd's drug store. There was a GE Cassette Adapter (model97572) behind the counter for sale at $8. I figured , what the heck, why not try it.

This one does not click or pop like all the others. It simply WORKS! Yea!

So, if you have a car stereo that clicks and pops to reverse the tape automatically, look no further. I tried to find a link to the item online. Unfortunately, none exists.

Volvo and iPOD connections

Well all I can say is thank goodness I have such a great relationship with my service tech. The $300 kit, plus $200 in labor for the install amounts to a useless heap of .. @#$@$.

I bought the iPOD video last month, and have been rather satisfied with it from several fronts. It even plays video straight out of the headphone port with the $19 iPod AV Cable from Apple. So it really is handy for watching movies on the road.

So. I try to use it in my car. I have a Volvo V70XC Cross Country 2001. It has been an OK car, when it is NOT in the shop. That is another story for another blog entry.

I tried every single FM transmitter in the Atlanta Lenox Apple store. I bought one, walk out to the garage, tried it out, return.. 6 iterations later, nothing would work. I also tried the cassette adapter, but my stereo wants to reverse the tape, so it incessantly clicks. Other than the clicking, this is the ticket, as it costs $20. I can't stand the clicking, so I trucked over to Nally Volvo on Windy Hill in Atlanta GA having heard that Volvo has some kit for the car.

They had apparently just received this kit. Grant, my service rep there, had not actually gone through an install. We all, including his manager, thought it would simply allow me to play my songs from the iPOD.

Wrong. Observe the image to the right. That screenshot on the iPOD is all you get. Also, you have to have your CD Changer removed just to install it. I wondered why until I tried it out.

What it does is require the user to formulate 9 new Playlists within iTunes. Then the 10th Playlist is not actually a playlist. The 10th allows you to play all your songs, sorted by Artist. I have 7000 songs. So the stereo is not capable of addressing that many songs. Moreover, neither the stereo nor the iPOD allow the user to view what is actually playing. No text is displayed anywhere just numbers like a CD player.

In short, this is a POOR design and reflects very poorly on the judgement of Lars-Erik Roos, Managing Director, Accessory Business Unit at Volvo Cars.

All they needed was a RCA stereo lead to 8mm cable and the user could play using all the built-in features of the iPOD. Yet, there is no AUX RCA inputs to plug into in Volvo stereos prior to 2004 (?). With the Volvo iPod kit, all of those features are disable or obfuscated.

Thankfully, Nally is making a full refund of the $500 and replacing my CD Changer back into the car to restore my status to the previous setup.

I just can't figure how Volvo would ever have allowed this to come to pass to begin with?

Mystifying.

DS-A1 DS-A2: iPod Cradles for Onkyo Components and systems

This retails at around $99. If you use a remote and you can't view the song tracks on the screen, so you would have to get up and walk across the room to look anyway!

The VIDEO iPOD (80gb) supports direct RCA connections thru the headphone jack for VIDEO and AUDIO. You do need to use the Apple cable for $20. Generic 3 way RCA to 8mm cables don't insert deep enough into the iPOD to get the video connection. Using Handbrake on Mac, I can then take my DVD's with me on the road with the master copies safe and sound at home. It is like a TiVo in my pocket.

Also, using the Onkyo, you give up your S-Video port. Most TV's only have one. Also, they could have simply used the component video lead (yellow RCA) direct to the AMP, and reduced the complicated wiring.

Ah well.